Historically, openness to free trade increased considerably between 1815 and the beginning of the First World War. In the 1920s, trade opening resumed, but collapsed during the Great Depression (especially in Europe and North America). Trade openings increased again sharply from the 1950s on (albeit with a slowdown during the oil crisis of the 1970s). Economists and economic historians say the current level of openness to trade is the highest they have ever been.    1. Choose two different visual media that express opinions on trade agreements, trade barriers or free trade. The resource list contains some examples of visual media and instructions for Internet search. Make sure you include the media element or access instructions with your evaluation. Write down the most important events and ideas that are recognizable in the item, creator and date of origin and read all included entries or quotes. “that the impact of education on voters` opinions on trade and globalization is more related to exposure to economic ideas and information on the aggregate and multiple effects of these economic phenomena than to individual calculations on the impact of trade on personal income or job security. This is not to say that these latest calculations are not important in shaping people`s views on trade, but simply that they do not manifest themselves by the simple link between education and support for openness to trade.
 Most economists would agree that an increase in order yields could certainly mean that a certain industry could move to a specific geographic area without strong economic reasons for comparative advantages, but this is no reason to argue against free trade, as the absolute level of production will increase for both winners and losers. , the winning winner being bigger than the loser. , but both earn more than before at an absolute level. [Citation required] The political dynamics would lead people to see a link between tariffs and the economic cycle that was not there. A boom would generate enough revenue for tariffs to fall, and if bankruptcy were to happen, there would be pressure to increase them again. At the time this happened, the economy was about to recover, which gave the impression that the tariff cuts caused the crash and that the opposite caused the recovery.